Putter · 2025
Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport
The CaddyIndex™ breakdown: our rating across all six performance dimensions, researched from published expert reviews, online sentiment and our own weighting algorithm.
By the CaddyCompare editorial team · updated 2 September 2026
Performance index
Six researched ratings, lower (blue) through to elite (gold).
Where it wins
- Feel93
- Looks92
- Sound91
Watch
Rated highest for feel and looks; its softest dimension is workability.
Your stroke curves gently and you want the traditional shape with a softer strike than it used to give.
You miss the middle often, or you want the direct feedback of a solid milled face.
Pros
- The softest strike Scotty has built into this shape, without losing the report on a miss
- Weight moved out of the neck and into tungsten at the ends, so a slim blade holds up better
- Long-range pace control that is a genuine step on from the solid-faced version
- The classic outline, unchanged where it matters
Cons
- Standard width, so the Plus bodies alongside it are the steadier choice
- An insert rather than solid steel, which purists who want the old feedback will notice
By dimension
Forgiveness
StrongTungsten in the corners and mass taken off the neck steady a standard-width blade more than the shape suggests.
Distance
ExcellentLong-range pace is the standout, the insert giving up speed gradually enough to leave lags close.
Workability
SolidA plumber's neck with mid-range hang, cut for a stroke that curves gently rather than swings hard inside.
Feel
Class-leadingThe softest impact this shape has ever had, the carbon insert absorbing the hit without deadening it.
Sound
Class-leadingA hushed, clean note, the milling cutting the ring the older solid-faced Newports gave off.
Looks at address
Class-leadingA shape that needs no introduction, now fronted by a warm-toned panel under a marginally thicker top edge.
Sources
Dig into the independent expert reviews and lab tests that feed into how every club here is rated. Each one is worth reading in full — they carry the launch-monitor data, hands-on testing and detailed photography that paint the complete picture before you buy.
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport Putter Review — feel, roll, forgiveness, weighting | National Club Golfer
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Studio Style Putter Review — insert feel, feedback, blade toe hang | Plugged In Golf
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron 2025 Studio Style putters: 4 things to know — neck configurations and construction | Golf.com
- Read the full review at New Scotty Cameron Studio Style putters — prices, lengths, insert and finish | Today's Golfer
- Read the full review at 2025 Scotty Cameron Studio Style putters — blade redesign and construction | GolfWRX
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Update Studio Style Putters For 2025 — UK pricing, specs, grip | Golfalot
- Read the full review at Titleist Scotty Cameron Studio Style — 2026 Hot List, blade putters gold medal | Golf Digest
- Read the full review at Studio Style Newport — official page (plumbing neck, SCS insert, tungsten sole weights, misted finish)
- Read the full review at Studio Style Newport — Titleist product specs (303 stainless, 3.5 deg loft, 33/34/35in)
- Read the full review at Super Select Newport — predecessor page (insert-free solid stainless, dual-milled face, silver mist)
More Putter ratings
Frequently asked questions
Who is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport best for?
Your stroke curves gently and you want the traditional shape with a softer strike than it used to give.
Who should avoid the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport?
You miss the middle often, or you want the direct feedback of a solid milled face.
What handicap is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport suitable for?
The Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport scores strongest for high-handicap golfers, and also suits mid-handicap golfers and scratch and tour players.
What is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport best at?
In our research the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport rates highest for feel and looks at address, and is softest on workability.