Putter · 2025
Scotty Cameron Studio Style Fastback
The CaddyIndex™ breakdown: our rating across all six performance dimensions, researched from published expert reviews, online sentiment and our own weighting algorithm.
By the CaddyCompare editorial team · updated 2 September 2026
Performance index
Six researched ratings, lower (blue) through to elite (gold).
Where it wins
- Feel92
- Sound90
- Distance88
Watch
Rated highest for feel and sound; its softest dimension is workability.
You putt on a straight line and want a compact mallet that still feels like milled steel.
Your stroke arcs, or you want the plain look of a traditional blade.
Pros
- The steadiest head in this blade-led line without moving to a full-size mallet
- A dark inlay across the back that genuinely helps you set the face square
- The softest impact Scotty has built into this range, and it still reports where you struck it
- Weighting is specified per shaft length, so a short one does not feel light in the hands
Cons
- The hollowed rear section and two-metal construction will look fussy to anyone who wants a plain head
- Nearly face-balanced, so a stroke with any real arc gets nothing from it
By dimension
Forgiveness
ExcellentAn aluminium sole plate and dark heel-toe inlay throw weight outward, steadier than the blades but short of a full mallet.
Distance
ExcellentLag putting is the strength here, with enough consistency off the insert to trust a fifty-footer.
Workability
ModestOne bend in the shaft sits the head almost square, so the face barely rotates and shaping is off the table.
Feel
Class-leadingThe carbon steel insert takes the hardness out of impact while still letting a poor strike register.
Sound
Class-leadingA low, gentle note off the insert that gives away little about where you struck the ball.
Looks at address
ExcellentThe reworked sole sits it square and the dark inlay frames the ball, though the cut-out flange divides opinion.
Sources
Dig into the independent expert reviews and lab tests that feed into how every club here is rated. Each one is worth reading in full — they carry the launch-monitor data, hands-on testing and detailed photography that paint the complete picture before you buy.
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Studio Style Putter Review — feel, feedback, mallet forgiveness, address look | Plugged In Golf
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron 2025 Studio Style putters: 4 things to know — perimeter-weighted mid-mallets, mid-bend shaft | Golf.com
- Read the full review at New Scotty Cameron Studio Style putters — prices, lengths, insert and finish details | Today's Golfer
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Studio Style mid-mallet review — insert feel, distance control, roll | Golf Monthly
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Update Studio Style Putters For 2025 — specs, UK pricing, balance and grip | Golfalot
- Read the full review at 2025 Scotty Cameron Studio Style putters — perimeter-weighted mid-mallet construction | GolfWRX
- Read the full review at Titleist Scotty Cameron Studio Style — 2026 Hot List, mallet putters gold medal | Golf Digest
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron launches 2025 Studio Style putters — construction, face milling, model list | PGA TOUR
- Read the full review at Studio Style Fastback — official page (compact mid-mallet, mid-bend shaft, heel-toe inlay, SCS insert)
- Read the full review at Studio Style Fastback — Titleist product specs (303 stainless, 6061 aluminium sole plate, 33/34/35in)
More Putter ratings
Frequently asked questions
Who is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Fastback best for?
You putt on a straight line and want a compact mallet that still feels like milled steel.
Who should avoid the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Fastback?
Your stroke arcs, or you want the plain look of a traditional blade.
What handicap is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Fastback suitable for?
The Scotty Cameron Studio Style Fastback scores strongest for high-handicap golfers.
What is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Fastback best at?
In our research the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Fastback rates highest for feel and sound, and is softest on workability.