Putter · 2025
Scotty Cameron Studio Style Del Mar
The CaddyIndex™ breakdown: our rating across all six performance dimensions, researched from published expert reviews, online sentiment and our own weighting algorithm.
By the CaddyCompare editorial team · updated 2 September 2026
Performance index
Six researched ratings, lower (blue) through to elite (gold).
Where it wins
- Feel91
- Sound90
- Looks88
Watch
Rated highest for feel and sound; its softest dimension is workability.
Your stroke arcs strongly and you want to feel the face work rather than have it held square.
You putt on a straight line, or you miss the middle regularly.
Pros
- Genuine toe release for a stroke that swings well inside the line
- Milled from one block of steel, which is where the softness comes from
- Heel and toe sole weights matched to length rather than added as an afterthought
- The rear-pocket discs are milled bare rather than painted, marking this out as the later build
Cons
- Strike it near either end of the face and the ball will pull up a long way from where you aimed
- The shaping behind the flange divides opinion and always has
By dimension
Forgiveness
StrongWeight is pushed out to the corners of the head, yet contact well away from centre still loses speed.
Distance
ExcellentDistance is easy to trust off the levelled face, an improvement on the older mid-milled head.
Workability
StrongA flow neck gives real toe release, so the face opens and shuts with a swinging stroke.
Feel
Class-leadingCutting the face twice takes the hardness out of impact without leaving the strike vague.
Sound
Class-leadingA muted, low report that carries none of the sharpness the earlier milled heads gave off.
Looks at address
ExcellentBare-metal discs milled into the rear pocket sharpen a profile that has never pleased everyone.
Sources
Dig into the independent expert reviews and lab tests that feed into how every club here is rated. Each one is worth reading in full — they carry the launch-monitor data, hands-on testing and detailed photography that paint the complete picture before you buy.
- Read the full review at Titleist Scotty Cameron Super Select Putters Review — specs, prices, neck types | Today's Golfer
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Del Mar Putter Review — miss behaviour, toe hang, address shape | Plugged In Golf
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Super Select putters First Look — dual-milled process, grips, release dates | Golf.com
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Super Select Putter Review — face milling, acoustics versus the previous line | Golf Monthly
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Super Select Putter Review — dual-milled feel and roll behaviour | Plugged In Golf
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron 2025 Studio Style putters: 4 things to know — model list and availability | Golf.com
- Read the full review at Super Select Del Mar — official page (heel-shafted compact mallet, flow neck, sole weights, narrower topline)
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron launches 2025 Studio Style putters — full twelve-model lineup | PGA TOUR
- Read the full review at Super Select Del Mar — Titleist specs (3.5 deg loft, 70 deg lie, 303 stainless, length-matched sole weights)
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron 2025 Super Select Del Mar MOTO Putter — the 2025 build of the Del Mar head
More Putter ratings
Frequently asked questions
Who is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Del Mar best for?
Your stroke arcs strongly and you want to feel the face work rather than have it held square.
Who should avoid the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Del Mar?
You putt on a straight line, or you miss the middle regularly.
What handicap is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Del Mar suitable for?
The Scotty Cameron Studio Style Del Mar suits a broad range of abilities, from high-handicap beginners through to scratch and tour players.
What is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Del Mar best at?
In our research the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Del Mar rates highest for feel and sound, and is softest on workability.