CADDYCOMPARE

Fairway · 2021

Ping G425 SFT

The CaddyIndex™ breakdown: our rating across all six performance dimensions, researched from published expert reviews, online sentiment and our own weighting algorithm.

By the CaddyCompare editorial team · updated 23 May 2026

70CaddyIndex™
Scores foryour handicap · saved on this device
Ping G425 SFT

Performance index

Six researched ratings, lower (blue) through to elite (gold).

Forgiveness
75
Distance
69
Workability
53
Feel
75
Sound
73
Looks
76

Where it wins

  • Looks76
  • Forgiveness75
  • Feel75

Watch

Workability53

Rated highest for looks and forgiveness; its softest dimension is workability.

Fits your gameAll-round
set your handicap on the score above
Best for

You're a mid-to-high HCP (12-30) at 75-100mph who fights a slice and wants a fairway wood with built-in draw bias and high launch — comfortable buying second-hand for under £180.

Avoid if

You hit a straight or fade-bias ball (the G425 Max is neutral, the LST is workable), you're sensitive to loud impact acoustics, or you want maximum total distance — the draw bias and higher lofts cost peak yards.

Pros

  • Reviewer testing: launches high, is consistently forgiving, and reigns in the right miss — strong slice-correcting performance
  • Approximately 25 yards of draw bias compared to the neutral sibling — 23g tungsten heel weight enforces the slice-correcting bias
  • Three loft options (16°, 19°, 22°) — slightly higher lofts than the Max/LST help slow swing speeds get the ball airborne
  • Same face technology as the family — outrageously good feel on centred strikes

Cons

  • Built-in 25-yard draw bias is costly for straight hitters — the head fights player-driven fades and limits shape control
  • Loud, wood-bat thwack acoustic — same consumer concern as the neutral sibling
  • Modest distance gain (+3 yds vs the prior SFT) — the new face technologies didn't translate to category-leading total carry
  • Now 5 years old — superseded by the G430 SFT (2023) and G440 SFT (2025) within the brand's own lineup

By dimension

75

Forgiveness

Strong

Reviewer testing: the head launches high, is consistently forgiving, and reigns in the right miss. A larger head and heel-side CG increase forgiveness. The 23g tungsten back/heel weight strategically positions the CG for forgiveness and slice-correction. The face technology normalises low-face mishit performance (face loft drops ~2.5° low on the face). Top-tier 2021 forgiveness for slicers — the draw-bias geometry is itself a forgiveness multiplier for the target audience.

69

Distance

Solid

Manufacturer claims 3 yards extra carry distance over the prior generation via the new face technologies. The cup-face delivers +1.5mph ball speed (shared with the neutral sibling). Higher loft offerings (16°/19°/22°) versus the neutral sibling cost some total distance via launch trade-off. The draw bias and heel-CG also subtract some peak distance versus the neutral sibling. Mid-pack 2021 distance — modest gain over the predecessor, slight loss versus the neutral sibling.

53

Workability

Modest

Manufacturer claims approximately 25 yards of draw bias compared to the neutral sibling. The 23g tungsten back/heel weight and heel-side CG are explicitly engineered for built-in draw. The technology is designed to get the face more closed at impact to minimise the right miss or promote a draw — the head imposes a bias rather than allowing free shape control. Below-average workability — by design, the head fights player-driven fades.

75

Feel

Strong

Reviewer testing: all heads in the family deliver outrageously good feel when you strike the ball dead centre on the face. Well-struck shots feel like cannons off the face. The maraging steel cup-face is shared with the neutral sibling for consistent tactile signature. Above-average feel — same face technology as the neutral sibling with the brand's signature solid tactile signature.

73

Sound

Solid

Reviewer testing: the brand's line of fairway woods are loud, with well-struck shots feeling like cannons off the face but sounding like a wood bat thwack. Same acoustic concern as the neutral sibling. The face technology prioritises ball-speed retention over acoustic damping. Below-average acoustic — loud and distinctive, with consumer-noted volume concerns.

76

Looks at address

Strong

Reviewer testing: traditional matte black crown with three alignment dots centred on the leading edge with a much more rounded head shape and a significantly larger footprint. The new three-dot alignment aid replaces the prior Turbulators. The larger, rounded footprint inspires confidence at address but reads less classical than the tour-spec sibling. Solid above-average looks — clean brand aesthetic, larger draw-bias footprint visible at address.

Sources

Dig into the independent expert reviews and lab tests that feed into how every club here is rated. Each one is worth reading in full — they carry the launch-monitor data, hands-on testing and detailed photography that paint the complete picture before you buy.

We paraphrase and synthesise these sources; we don't republish them. Publishers can read how we use reviews or request a change.

More Fairway ratings

Frequently asked questions

Who is the Ping G425 SFT best for?

You're a mid-to-high HCP (12-30) at 75-100mph who fights a slice and wants a fairway wood with built-in draw bias and high launch — comfortable buying second-hand for under £180.

Who should avoid the Ping G425 SFT?

You hit a straight or fade-bias ball (the G425 Max is neutral, the LST is workable), you're sensitive to loud impact acoustics, or you want maximum total distance — the draw bias and higher lofts cost peak yards.

What handicap is the Ping G425 SFT suitable for?

The Ping G425 SFT scores strongest for high-handicap golfers, and also suits mid-handicap golfers.

What is the Ping G425 SFT best at?

In our research the Ping G425 SFT rates highest for forgiveness and distance, and is softest on workability.

Does the Ping G425 SFT have a shot bias?

The Ping G425 SFT has a draw bias, with a high launch and mid spin.