Putter · 2025
Scotty Cameron Studio Style Squareback 2
The CaddyIndex™ breakdown: our rating across all six performance dimensions, researched from published expert reviews, online sentiment and our own weighting algorithm.
By the CaddyCompare editorial team · updated 7 June 2026
Performance index
Six researched ratings, lower (blue) through to elite (gold).
Where it wins
- Feel91
- Looks91
- Sound89
Watch
Rated highest for feel and looks; its softest dimension is workability.
You putt with a straight stroke and want the most forgiving Studio Style shape - a widebody ring-weighted mid-mallet with the new soft Studio Carbon Steel feel and enhanced alignment.
You putt with an arc, you want a compact blade, or you want a value price.
Pros
- A widebody ring-weighted mid-mallet - the most forgiving Studio Style shape
- A black anodized aluminium heel-toe inlay for alignment and MOI
- A new Studio Carbon Steel insert - soft but solid and premium
- A Golf Digest 2026 Hot List model
Cons
- Near-face-balanced - built for a straight stroke, not an arc
- A larger mid-mallet head
- A premium £499 price
By dimension
Forgiveness
ExcellentStrong for a mid-mallet - the widebody Squareback 2 uses a ring-weighted, perimeter-weighted multi-material design with a black anodized aluminium heel-toe inlay for high MOI, more stable and consistent than the blades. Among the more forgiving mid-mallets in the line - a widebody ring-weighted head.
Distance
ExcellentA standout - the Studio Carbon Steel chain-link insert gives a steady roll with controlled speed, the chain-link milling helping confident speed on short-to-mid putts. Among the better putters for distance control.
Workability
ModestA near-face-balanced mid-mallet - the Squareback 2 is a near-face-balanced, widebody mid-mallet that sits square at address. Very limited arc-fit - built for a straight stroke.
Feel
Class-leadingSoft and solid - the Squareback 2 feels soft but solid and premium, the Studio Carbon Steel insert giving responsive feedback, the chain-link milling delivering a softer sensation than previous generations. Among the very best putter feels - a premium carbon-steel insert.
Sound
ExcellentA responsive click - the carbon-steel face gives a responsive click that is soft but not muted, the chain-link milling delivering a refined acoustic. A clean, crisp note - livelier than the muted blades.
Looks at address
Class-leadingModern and clean - the widebody mid-mallet with a black anodized aluminium heel-toe inlay enhances alignment, a high-alignment, confidence-inspiring design. Among the cleaner, most alignment-friendly mid-mallets.
Sources
Dig into the independent expert reviews and lab tests that feed into how every club here is rated. Each one is worth reading in full — they carry the launch-monitor data, hands-on testing and detailed photography that paint the complete picture before you buy.
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron Studio Style Putter Review - Plugged In Golf
- Read the full review at 2025 Scotty Cameron Studio Style putters - GolfWRX
- Read the full review at Scotty Cameron 2025 Studio Style putters: 4 things to know - Golf.com
- Read the full review at Titleist Scotty Cameron Studio Style - 2026 Hot List - Golf Digest
- Read the full review at Squareback 2 - Studio Style - Scotty Cameron
More Putter ratings
Frequently asked questions
Who is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Squareback 2 best for?
You putt with a straight stroke and want the most forgiving Studio Style shape - a widebody ring-weighted mid-mallet with the new soft Studio Carbon Steel feel and enhanced alignment.
Who should avoid the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Squareback 2?
You putt with an arc, you want a compact blade, or you want a value price.
What handicap is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Squareback 2 suitable for?
The Scotty Cameron Studio Style Squareback 2 scores strongest for high-handicap golfers.
What is the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Squareback 2 best at?
In our research the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Squareback 2 rates highest for feel and looks at address, and is softest on workability.