CADDYCOMPARE

Ping · Irons · 2025

i240

CaddyIndex™ breakdown — what the agentic research found across each of the six performance dimensions, with cited sources.

89CaddyIndex™confidence 0.81
Best for

You're a low-to-mid handicapper who wants a compact, workable players' iron with superb feel, a higher, softer-landing flight, and a touch more forgiveness than the i230.

Avoid if

You need real distance or forgiveness (a players-distance or game-improvement iron), or you already game the i230 (it's a minor update).

Pros

  • More forgiving than the i230 - added perimeter weighting and a high-density toe weight raise MOI 2.5% across the set
  • A degree-higher launch and 300+ rpm more spin than the i230 - balls stop faster and land closer to target
  • Incredibly soft yet crisper feel, with excellent feedback and no sting
  • A shorter blade length and more compact, confidence-inspiring shape that wins on looks

Cons

  • Average distance, by design - it spins more for control, not yards
  • A players' cavity-back for solid ball strikers - not a forgiveness or distance iron
  • If you're happy with the i230, there's no compelling reason to upgrade

By dimension

Sources

Some of the reviews, lab tests and head-to-head comparisons the agentic research read while grading this club.

Ping i240 — CaddyIndex™ breakdown | CaddyCompare