Driver · 2020
Callaway Mavrik Max
The CaddyIndex™ breakdown: our rating across all six performance dimensions, researched from published expert reviews, online sentiment and our own weighting algorithm.
By the CaddyCompare editorial team · updated 16 May 2026
Performance index
Six researched ratings, lower (blue) through to elite (gold).
Where it wins
- Looks84
- Feel80
- Sound80
Watch
Rated highest for looks and feel; its softest dimension is workability.
You're a mid-to-high HCP (10-30) at 80-105mph shopping the used market for 2020-era value — particularly attractive if you fight a slice and would use the heel-weight draw option.
You want modern face tech (Ai 10x is two generations ahead), you're a better player needing fade capability (the head only goes neutral-or-draw), or you swing higher and would benefit from the Mavrik Sub Zero's tour-spec profile.
Pros
- 8,700 MOI with the 14g weight in the rear position — exceptionally forgiving for the 2020 era, near class-leading at release
- Two interchangeable weights (14g / 2g) swap between rear (max MOI) and heel (~14 yards of left bias) — meaningful slice-correction option
- Golf Digest 2020 Hot List Gold plus 1mph above average ball speed in ClubTest 2020 — recognised across major outlets
- Same AI-designed face and acoustic-engineered sound as the standard Mavrik — class-leading 2020 face technology
Cons
- Five years out of date — exponential recency penalty drops the published score by roughly 11 points versus a 2025-equivalent
- Both weight positions are neutral-or-draw — no fade option, the head fights one direction by design
- Face technology has progressed two full generations since (Flash Face SS20 → SS21 → AI Smart Face → Ai 10x)
By dimension
Forgiveness
StrongIndependent reviewer testing documents 8,700 MOI with the 14-gram weight in the rear position — exceptionally forgiving by conventional measures. Mis-hits don't lose much distance and don't go far off line versus sweet-spot strikes. Buyer's-guide testing placed it near the top in multiple performance categories, ranked near the top in accuracy. Top of the game-improvement-driver range.
Distance
StrongReviewer testing measured 168.7 mph ball speed with a total distance of 312 yards. Buyer's-guide testing placed it a mile per hour faster than the average ball speed for all drivers tested. Slightly below the family's standard sibling because the higher-MOI build trades some absolute speed for forgiveness — but still mid-anchor for the game-improvement category.
Workability
ModestWhen the heavier weight is moved to the heel, the head produces about 14 yards of left bias to help golfers who struggle with a slice — both weight positions are neutral-or-draw, no fade option. With weight in the rear, the head adds solid stability; 14g in rear for max forgiveness, 14g in heel for max draw. The head fights one direction by design — bottom of game-improvement range.
Feel
StrongReviewer testing notes the feel is just as stable and solid as the family's standard sibling, with a nice balance between forgiveness and feedback. Contact feels crisp and solid with a sound to match. Family-shared acoustic engineering produces a solid tactile signature; slightly below the standard sibling because the heavier deep-CG build dampens the explosive character.
Sound
StrongReviewer testing notes the over-the-top explosive sound of the prior generation has been replaced with a much more natural, muted crack — not too loud or too muted. A solid impact note with a bit of clickiness — similar to the family's standard sibling. AI-tuned acoustic produces refined character.
Looks at address
ExcellentReviewer testing describes the largest footprint from address with a straight topline and a crown that stretches back and down towards the turf — a confidence-inspiring look. Launch coverage notes the shape is very similar to the prior generation — less innovative aesthetically than the family's standard sibling. Earned Gold-tier Hot List recognition despite the less daring shape — solid mainstream game-improvement looks.
Sources
Dig into the independent expert reviews and lab tests that feed into how every club here is rated. Each one is worth reading in full — they carry the launch-monitor data, hands-on testing and detailed photography that paint the complete picture before you buy.
- Read the full review at Callaway MAVRIK MAX Driver Review - Plugged In Golf
- Read the full review at Callaway Mavrik Max driver review, photos and video: ClubTest 2020 - GOLF.com
- Read the full review at Callaway Mavrik Max Review - Today's Golfer
- Read the full review at 2020 Callaway Mavrik drivers: Faster means farther - GolfWRX
- Read the full review at Callaway MAVRIK MAX Driver Review - Customized Experience - Golfstead
- Read the full review at Callaway MAVRIK MAX Drivers - Callaway Golf Pre-Owned
- Read the full review at MAVRIK And Callaway Dominate 2020 Golf Digest Hot List
- Read the full review at How to adjust your Callaway Mavrik Max driver - Golfbidder
We paraphrase and synthesise these sources; we don't republish them. Publishers can read how we use reviews or request a change.
More Driver ratings
Frequently asked questions
Who is the Callaway Mavrik Max best for?
You're a mid-to-high HCP (10-30) at 80-105mph shopping the used market for 2020-era value — particularly attractive if you fight a slice and would use the heel-weight draw option.
Who should avoid the Callaway Mavrik Max?
You want modern face tech (Ai 10x is two generations ahead), you're a better player needing fade capability (the head only goes neutral-or-draw), or you swing higher and would benefit from the Mavrik Sub Zero's tour-spec profile.
What handicap is the Callaway Mavrik Max suitable for?
The Callaway Mavrik Max scores strongest for high-handicap golfers, and also suits mid-handicap golfers.
What is the Callaway Mavrik Max best at?
In our research the Callaway Mavrik Max rates highest for forgiveness and distance, and is softest on workability.
Does the Callaway Mavrik Max have a shot bias?
The Callaway Mavrik Max has a draw bias, with a high launch and mid spin.